Legal Opinion
Sprint Spectrum L.P. v. Charter Township of West Bloomfield
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided April 30, 2001No. 2:00-cv-72657PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DUGGAN, District Judge.
On June 13, 2000, Plaintiff, Sprint Spectrum, L.P., filed suit against Defendant, Charter Township of West Bloomfield, alleging that the Township violated the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. § 151, et. seq., when it denied Sprint’s application to build a communication tower. The matter is currently before the Court on Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and Plaintiffs cross motion impartial summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court entertained oral argument on November 1, 2000. For the reasons set forth…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Luther D. Mullen v. Otis Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Richard G. Shepherd v. Otis Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Cellular Telephone Company, Doing Business as at & T Wireless Services v. The Town of Oyster Bay and the Town Board of the Town of Oyster BayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Town of Amherst v. Omnipoint Communications Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kramer v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
- Sprint Spectrum, L.P. v. Charter Township of BrandonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008