Legal Opinion
Kotler v. NAT. RR PASSENGER CORP.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided August 29, 2008No. A-5985-06T2PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
954 A.2d 514 (2008)
402 N.J. Super. 372
Dmitriy KOTLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION ("AMTRAK"), Defendant-Respondent.
No. A-5985-06T2.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued April 22, 2008.
Decided August 29, 2008.
Samuel J. Rosenthal, argued the cause for appellant (Barish Rosenthal, attorneys, Philadelphia, PA; Rudolph V. DeGeorge, II, on the brief).
Gerald T. Ford, Newark, argued the cause for respondent (Landman Corsi Ballaine & Ford, attorneys; Mr. Ford and Natalie Garcia, on the brief).
Before Judges SKILLMAN, WINKELSTEIN and LeWINN.
LeWINN,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Eichel v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Tipton v. Socony Mobil Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Earl K. Phillips and Carrie Phillips v. The Western Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- New York, New Haven & Hartford R. Co. v. LearyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953
- Theodore Gladden v. P. Henderson & Co. v. Lavino Shipping Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Estrada v. PORT CITY PROPERTIES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- William James v. Rosalind RuizNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015
- Estrada v. PORT CITY PROPERTIES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011