Legal Opinion

Donahue Schriber Realty Group, L.P. v. Salinas

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 2014No. 59071Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Salinas. Salinas was awarded $2,181,750 and judgment was entered holding Donahue and Malco jointly and severally liable. Donahue and Malco appealed that judgment to this court, but Malco also filed post-trial motions pursuant to NRCP 59(e) and NRCP 60(b) asking the district court to amend the wording of the judgment to conform to the verdict and to amend the judgment to apply several liability only. The district court denied both motions, and Malco appealed those orders as well. On appeal, Donahue argues that the district court erred in refusing to allow the amount of workers' compensation…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Lioce v. CohenNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Richmond v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Barrett v. BairdNevada Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Potter v. PotterNevada Supreme Court · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API