Legal Opinion

Richmond v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 2002No. 37933PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*925OPINION

By the Court,

Rose, J.:

In Braunstein v. State,1 this court modified the rules of evidence concerning the admissibility of prior bad act evidence in prosecutions of sex crimes. The primary issue in this appeal concerns whether this rule should apply to criminal convictions arising from trials held prior to our decision in Braunstein, and not yet resolved on direct appeal.

We hold that Braunstein is to be applied to all criminal cases arising from trials held prior to that decision and not yet resolved on direct appeal, provided the issue has been preserved for appeal. Following a…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Petrocelli v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1985
  5. American Home Assurance Company v. Sunshine Supermarket, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Rosky v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Nunnery v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Weber v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Grey v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. FavelMontana Supreme Court · 2015

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API