Legal Opinion

Potter v. Potter

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 2005No. 42488PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court, Becker, C. J.:

This appeal involves whether Nevada’s relocation statute, NRS 125C.200, applies to parties who share joint physical custody of their minor children. We conclude that it does not. When one parent in a joint physical custody arrangement desires to move outside of Nevada with the minor children, the correct procedure is to file a motion for change of custody under NRS 125.510(2) for the purpose of relocation. The district court must then determine whether the best interests of the children are better served by living outside of Nevada with the relocating parent…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Beazer Homes Nevada, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. CatanioNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Schwartz v. SchwartzNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Metz v. MetzNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State Department of Human Resources, Welfare Division v. Estate of UllmerNevada Supreme Court · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Leven v. FreyNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Rivero v. RiveroNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Washoe Medical Center v. Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of WashoeNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Maynard v. McNettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Clark County District Attorney v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API