Legal Opinion
Dickerson v. Bailey
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided July 17, 2002No. CIV.A.H-99-1247PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HARMON, District Judge.
Pending before the Court in the above referenced action, seeking a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief in Plaintiffs C.A. Dickerson, Roland R. Pennington, and David Vukovic’s challenge to the constitutionality of Texas’ statutory ban on direct importation of out-of-state wine by Texas residents for personal consumption, are Plaintiffs’ supplemental motion for summary judgment (instrument # 42) and a [supplemental] cross motion for summary judgment (instrument # 47) filed by Defendant Rolando Garza, successor to Doyne Bailey as Administrator of…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Printz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- City of Philadelphia v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dickerson v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Heald v. EnglerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Southern Wine and Spirits of Texas, Inc. v. SteenDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2007
- Swedenburg v. KellyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Heal D v. EnglerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.