Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

A. Widemann Co. v. Digges

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 28, 1913No. Civ. No. 1147PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Monterey County and from an order refusing a new trial. B. V. Sargent, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.

This action was for damages for defendant’s alleged breach of a contract expressed in writing as follows:

“King City, Cal., April 15, 1910.
“I have this day bought of E. A. Eaton five hundred tons barley, grading A No. 1 feed, San Francisco Merchants’ Exchange standard, and agree to pay to said E. A. Eaton the sum of one dollar per cental for all of said barley delivered at any Salinas Valley warehouse where freight rate to San Francisco does not exceed $3.00 per ton. Payment to be made immediately upon delivery. Delivery to be made at any time between this date and September 1st, 1910, and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Frisch v. CalerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Penrose v. WinterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Huffner v. SawdayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Richards v. Travelers' InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Scroufe v. ClayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wells Fargo Nevada National Bank v. Haslett Warehouse Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
  2. Haberly v. HaberlyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  3. Buffalo County v. Phelps CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API