Legal Opinion

Haberly v. Haberly

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 31, 1915No. Civ. No. 1465PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Frank J. Murasky, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The plaintiff in this action recovered a judgment against the defendant as the administrator of the estate of George W. Haberly, deceased, in the sum of eight hundred dollars, with interest thereon from the twenty-ninth day of March, 1901. George W. Plaberly died in the city and county of San Francisco on the fifth day of December, 1910. Thereafter, on March 11, 1911, his brother, William T. Haberly, was appointed administrator of his estate with the will annexed. Prior thereto, to wit, on the twenty-fourth day of January, 1911, William T. Haberly had been appointed as the guardian…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Huffner v. SawdayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. In re Estate of CoutsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Quinn v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  4. A. Widemann Co. v. DiggesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  5. Bernard v. MullotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1851

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Christiansen v. ChristiansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API