Huffner v. Sawday
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. W. R. Andrews, and Collier, Smith & Holcomb, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the Court
SLOSS J.
This is an action to enjoin the defendants from diverting water from a stream known as the San Pasqual River. The plaintiffs recovered judgment, and the defendants appeal from the judgment and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
The complaint sets forth two counts or causes of action. Bach of the counts alleges that the San Pasqual River is a stream arising in the Volcan Mountains in San Diego County, whence it flows in a westerly course through the San Pasqual Valley to the Pacific Ocean; that the plaintiffs are respectively, owners of seventeen several parcels of land…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- City of Los Angeles v. PomeroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Los Angeles Cemetery Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Anaheim Union Water Co. v. Fuller.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Montecito Valley Water Co. v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In Re Waters of Long Valley Creek Stream SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Miller v. Bay Cities Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Fall River Valley Irrigation District v. Mt. Shasta Power Corp.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Lindblom v. Round Valley Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Town of Antioch v. Williams Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.