Legal Opinion

Schuck & Sons Construction v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 29, 1998No. 2 CA-IC 97-0011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PELANDER, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 In this workers’ compensation case, the employee/claimant Gary Sinclair and the employer/carrier Schuck & Sons Construction executed and filed with the Industrial Commission a compromise and settlement agreement - for a lump sum compensation payment, which the Commission later approved despite Sinclair’s intervening death and Schuck’s attempted withdrawal from the settlement on that basis. In this statutory special action, Schuck challenges the administrative law judge’s (ALJ) award approving the agreement. We affirm the award.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 The underlying…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Frankel v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. Sorenson v. Six Companies, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Hoover Community Hotel Development Corp. v. ThomsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Reed v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  5. B. Frank Joy Co. v. IsaacCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tabler v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  2. Taylor v. Reliance Well Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API