Legal Opinion
In Re the Joint Petition of Rochester Express Limousine Service, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 23, 1993No. CX-93-1091PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Relators challenge the Minnesota Transportation Regulation Board’s decision denying them intervention in transfer proceedings between Rochester Express Limousine Service and Rochester Direct Corporation. We affirm.
FACTS
Respondents Rochester Express Limousine Service, Inc. (Rochester Express) and Rochester Direct Corporation (Rochester Direct) filed a joint petition with the Minnesota Transportation Regulation Board (Board) seeking approval of the transfer of a regular route common carrier certificate and a courier services permit. A competing carrier filed a protest, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crookston Cattle Co. v. Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- The Maytag Co. v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Krumm v. R. A. Nadeau Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Matter of Hibbing Taconite Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Mankato Aglime & Rock Co. v. City of MankatoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Petition for Clarification of an Appropriate UnitCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995