Legal Opinion

The Maytag Co. v. Commissioner of Taxation

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 17, 1944No. 33,873PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Youngdahl, Justice.

Plaintiff’s action is to recover an overpayment of income taxes for the year 1939. It paid a tax of $4,697.37 disclosed by its return to be due for that year. Defendant assessed a deficiency tax liability in the sum of $3,763.49, which, together with interest and penalty, totalled $4,553.09. Plaintiff paid this amount under protest and filed an application with defendant for a refund, which was refused. The court below denied plaintiff recovery. Its motion for a new, trial was denied and judgment entered for defendant. From this judgment, plaintiff appeals.

The question…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. New York Ex Rel. Whitney v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Cohen v. GouldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  4. Eberle v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  5. Commonwealth v. Bayuk Cigars, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State v. BarkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  2. Western Auto Supply Co. v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. Ferdinand Leo Gams, Jr., Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Steven Ronald Houghton, Appellant/Cross-Respondent.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  4. Lilly v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  5. State Ex Rel. Grozbach v. Common School District No. 65Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API