Legal Opinion

Mercury Cas. Co. v. City of Pasadena

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided August 24, 2017No. B266959; B268452PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLavin, J.

*920INTRODUCTION

In 2011, a storm brought hurricane-force winds to the City of Pasadena (City), uprooting more than 2,000 trees. One of those trees fell on the home of Sarah and Christopher Dusseault, causing severe property damage. Before it fell, the tree stood in a parkway that abuts the Dusseaults' property. Although the City owned the tree, there is no record of who planted it.

In 2012, Mercury Casualty Company (Mercury), the Dusseaults' insurer, sued the City for inverse condemnation. After a bench trial, the trial court entered judgment in Mercury's favor, finding the tree that fell on the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Paterno v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Clement v. State Reclamation BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Bauer v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Belair v. Riverside County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Murphy v. MooreDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  2. Sanchez v. United States Bureau of Land ManagementDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API