Murphy v. Moore
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DEAN MURPHY, Case No. 1:24-cv-00226-JLT-SKO 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 13 DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE BE v. GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN 14 PART DEWAYNE MOORE, individually, and as 15 Code Enforcement Inspector for the City of FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Fresno; CITY OF FRESNO, a City or THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO FILE 16 Municipality; and DOES 1-10, Inclusive, AN UNTIMELY FILING BE GRANTED 17 Defendants. (Doc. 11, 17, 18) 18 OBJECTIONS DUE: 21 DAYS 19 20…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.