Gillespie v. Waterwheel Farms, Inc.

{¶ 1} Ted Gillespie appeals from the trial court's entry of summary judgment against him on his complaint against appellees Waterwheel Farms, Inc., Paul D. Thies, and Richard Thies for damages he sustained as a result of being bitten by a dog.

{¶ 2} In his sole assignment of error, Gillespie contends the trial court erred in entering judgment against him as a matter of law on a strict-liability claim under R.C. 955.28(B).

{¶ 3} The record reflects that Gillespie, a delivery driver, was bitten while completing a delivery to the appellees' farm. His complaint included causes of action based on…