Legal Opinion

Markides v. Soffer

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 12, 1952No. Appeal, 35PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Arnold, J.,

This is an action of assumpsit to recover damages for breach of a covenant contained in a deed from defendant to the plaintiffs. After trial by the judge without a jury, judgment was entered for the defendant on a question of law, and the plaintiffs appealed.

The defendant was the owner of a building composed of three storerooms, and in .1910 conveyed the end storeroom to the plaintiffs, who had previously occupied it as his tenant. The deed provided: “Grantees are to receive heat from the center [storeroom] or Mr. Stone [the defendant’s tenant-occupant of the center] as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Price v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Disston EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Hess v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Kimmel v. SvonavecSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Ransberry v. Brodhead's Forest & Stream Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. King v. Travelers Insurance CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Spatz v. NasconeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Best v. Realty Management Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Hardes v. Penn Charcoal & Chemical Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Clearfield Development Corp. v. Devonian Gas & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API