Legal Opinion

Spatz v. Nascone

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 16, 1981No. 1625PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order dismissing appellants’ action in assumpsit and rescinding the agreement of sale between appellants and appellees. The case was tried before a judge sitting without a jury.

Appellants are a group of investors from Chicago, Illinois, who own property in Orchard Park, New York, as a joint venture called Orchard Park Associates. Appellees are Frank Zappala, an attorney, and Frank Nascone, a real estate developer. Appellees used to own the Orchard Park property. On September 2, 1966, they agreed to sell it to one Jack Jacobs, who was acting as broker on…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Don Chuy, in No. 77-1412 v. The Philadelphia Eagles Football Club (Sued as "The Philadelphia Eagles"), in No. 77-1411 and the National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  2. East Crossroads Center, Inc. v. Mellon-Stuart Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Chatham Communications, Inc. v. General Press Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Herr EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. United Refining Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Loyal Christian Benefit Ass'n v. BenderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. PBS Coal, Inc. v. Hardhat Mining, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Federal Insurance v. Susquehanna Broadcasting Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Levy v. First Pennsylvania Bank N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Merion Spring Co. v. Muelles Hnos. Garcia Torres, S.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API