Legal Opinion

Carter v. Vujasinovic

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 29, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2019-3746Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SAMANTHA CARTER, Pro se Plaintiff, v. Case No. 19-cv-3746 (CRC) VUK VUJASINOVIC, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION In 2012, Samantha Carter, with the assistance of a bevy of lawyers, brought a personal injury case in Texas state court. The case settled in 2017. According to Carter, her attorneys in that case stole more than $500,000 from the settlement proceeds that belonged to her. Carter, proceeding pro se, now brings suit in this Court against two of her former Texas attorneys, the Texas state court judge who presided over her…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Naartex Consulting Corporation, Russell Huff v. James G. Watt, Secretary of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  3. Michael Sindram v. John H. Suda Paul R. Webber, III Oliver P. Corbin Edward Jenkins Everett O'Quinn Frederick B. Beane, Jr. (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
  4. Green v. State Bar of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  5. Freeman v. FallinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API