Legal Opinion
Patricia Scott v. Clay County, Tennessee Chinn Anderson Billy Pierce Michael Thompson
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 1, 2000No. 98-6157PublishedCited by 311 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKrupansky, J., joined by Boggs, J.,
CLAY, J. (pp. 880-81), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
OPINION
KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge.
The defendants-appellants Clay County, Tennessee (“the County”), Sheriff Cecil “Chinn” Anderson (“Anderson”), Deputy Billy Pierce (“Pierce”), and Deputy Michael Thompson (“Thompson”) have contested the district court’s denial of their motion, anchored in qualified immunity, for Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 summary adjudication of the federal civil rights claims of the plaintiff-appellee Patricia Scott (“Patricia” or “the plaintiff’). The plaintiff alleged in her single-count complaint that Clay County Sheriffs…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by311 opinions
- Brosseau v. HaugenSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Tyron Brown v. Lee LucasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Lytle v. Bexar County, Tex.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Pace v. CapobiancoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Cheryl D. Lyons v. City of Xenia, Christine Keith, Officer Matthew Foubert, OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
306 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.