Eunice Hollins v. Atlantic Company, Inc. Swagelok Company Crawford Fitting Company John Doe Companies, 1-100
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RYAN, Circuit Judge.
This is a case in which an employer’s supervisors undertook to evaluate the suitability of a female employee’s hairstyle and, not surprisingly, got in over their heads. Eunice Hollins, an African-American, sued her employer, and its associated companies, collectively hereinafter “Atlantic,” alleging unlawful disparate treatment on the basis of race under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2000e-17, and Ohio Rev.Code § 4112.99, in the application of Atlantic’s personal grooming standards to Hollins’s hairstyle preferences. Hollins also alleged unlawful retaliation…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by245 opinions
- Francisco Vasquez v. County of Los Angeles, Erroneously Sued as Los Angeles County Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- White v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- William Radue v. Kimberly-Clark CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Thomas E. Bowman v. Shawnee State University Jessica J. JahnkeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Smith v. City of Salem, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
240 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.