Legal Opinion

Buchanan v. Mitchell County

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 7, 1978No. 7710IC1002PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

An agreement between the employer and workmen’s compensation carrier and the employee for the payment of compensation benefits, when approved by the Industrial Commission, is binding on the parties thereto. Pruitt v. Knight Publishing Co., 289 N.C. 254, 221 S.E. 2d 355 (1976); Neal v. Clary, 259 N.C. 163, 130 S.E. 2d 39 (1963). Such an agreement, however, may be set aside when “there has been error due to fraud, misrepresentation, undue influence or mutual mistake.” G.S. § 97-17.

The Commission correctly treated defendants’ request to be allowed to discontinue compensation…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pruitt v. Knight Publishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Inscoe v. DeRose Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Neal v. ClarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Spivey v. Oakley's General ContractorsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cross v. Blue Cross/Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Morrison v. Public Service Co. of North Carolina, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. Shay v. ROWAN SALISBURY SCHOOLSCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  4. Martin v. Piedmont Asphalt & Paving Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  5. Buchanan v. Mitchell CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API