Buchanan v. Mitchell County
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
An agreement between the employer and workmen’s compensation carrier and the employee for the payment of compensation benefits, when approved by the Industrial Commission, is binding on the parties thereto. Pruitt v. Knight Publishing Co., 289 N.C. 254, 221 S.E. 2d 355 (1976); Neal v. Clary, 259 N.C. 163, 130 S.E. 2d 39 (1963). Such an agreement, however, may be set aside when “there has been error due to fraud, misrepresentation, undue influence or mutual mistake.” G.S. § 97-17.
The Commission correctly treated defendants’ request to be allowed to discontinue compensation…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pruitt v. Knight Publishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Inscoe v. DeRose Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Neal v. ClarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Spivey v. Oakley's General ContractorsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cross v. Blue Cross/Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Morrison v. Public Service Co. of North Carolina, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Shay v. ROWAN SALISBURY SCHOOLSCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Martin v. Piedmont Asphalt & Paving Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Buchanan v. Mitchell CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.