Legal Opinion

Martin v. Piedmont Asphalt & Paving Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 21, 1993No. 9210IC1319PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Plaintiff’s attempted appeal is from an order of a Deputy Commissioner, and not from a final order of the Full Commission, and is therefore not an appeal of right. See G.S. § 7A-29; G.S. § 97-86. Simultaneously with the docketing of his attempted appeal, plaintiff properly filed with this Court a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to review the questions presented in his attempted appeal. Because there are matters of important public policy presented by the record in this case, pursuant to the provisions of G.S. § 7A-32(c) and Rule 21(a)(1) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure, we…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brookover v. Borden, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Buchanan v. Mitchell CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. IngramSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kisiah v. W.R. Kisiah Plumbing, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  2. Rice v. City of Winston-SalemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Peltier v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API