Courtney v. Pradt
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kentucky.
1Opinion of the Court
KNAPPEN, District Judge.
The plaintiff in error, a citizen of Kentucky, brought suit in the circuit court for Powell county, Ky., by attachment, under section 194 of the Kentucky Code of Practice, which gives the plaintiff the right, at or after the commencement of an action, to an attachment against the property of the defendant, including garnishees, as security for the satisfaction of judgment in an action for the recovery of money against a nonresident defendant. The defendants are all nonresidents of Kentucky. The defendant Louis A. Pradt is executor, and the other defendants legatees and…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- St. Clair v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- The Lafayette Ins. Co. v. FRENCHSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Ex Parte SchollenbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Commercial Nat. Bank v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
- Stearns Coal & Lumber Co. v. Van WinkleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- Bucyrus Co. v. McArthurDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1914
- McKemy v. Supreme Lodge A. O. U. W.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
- Estate of Paine v. GarnettSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.