Legal Opinion

Dunbar v. Fant

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 24, 1933No. 13682PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice BeEase.

Basing his action upon the statutory enactments now contained in Sections 7844 and 7852 of the Code, the appellant sought to recover of the respondents Fant, formerly the State Bank Examiner, and the surety on Fant’s official bond, damages alleged to have been sustained by the depositors and creditors of the Cowpens Security Bank, because of the failure of Fant “to well and truly perform the duties of his office.” The complaint alleged that Fant “failed to perform his duties, in that he failed to remedy or discontinue” certain…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Deatsch v. FairfieldArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  2. McCown v. MuldrowSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
  3. State ex rel. Mills v. American Surety Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Branchville Motor Co. v. AddenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  5. Sanders State Bank v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Jensen Ex Rel. Estate of Clark v. South Carolina Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  2. Tcherepnin v. FranzDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975
  3. Whatcom County v. LanglieWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Long v. SeabrookSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  5. Bush v. BabbAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API