Legal Opinion

Branchville Motor Co. v. Adden

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 30, 1930No. 12979PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

There were two demurrers, by separate defendants, to the complaint herein, but it will be convenient to treat them as one, as they present the same question of law, namely, whether the remedy provided by the Act of 1929, 36 Stat., 199, for the enforcement of the statutory liability of stockholders of banks to depositors, is exclusive of the previously existing direct remedy of depositors against the stockholders.

The Planters’ Bank of Orangeburg closed its doors on November 26, 1929, and, by action of the directors, was placed in the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Browne v. HammettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  2. Parker v. Carolina Savings BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1898
  3. Young v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Gary v. MatthewsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  5. Buist v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Fischer v. ChisholmSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance v. American Bank Trust Shares, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1976
  3. Dunbar v. FantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  4. State Ex Rel. Zimmerman v. GibbesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  5. Bethea v. AllenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API