Legal Opinion

Whatcom County v. Langlie

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1952No. 32177PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

We have been asked to review, by certiorari, the action of the superior court for Thurston county in refusing to continue a temporary restraining order as an injunction pendente lite.

Whatcom county, a municipal corporation, owns and operates a 100-bed general hospital, hereinafter referred to as the county hospital. (“Whatcom county,” as used in this opinion, refers to the municipal corporation unless the context indicates a different connotation.)

The state department of health is charged by law with the duty of providing necessary medical care and related services (including hospitalization)…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. Golden Age Brewing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
  2. State ex rel. Smith v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. In Re the Employees of Buffelen Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1948
  4. State ex rel. Berry v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Sweitzer v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1921

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hartman v. Washington State Game CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Berge v. GortonWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Boeing Airplane Co. v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Aripa v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Arnett v. Seattle General HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1964

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API