Legal Opinion
State v. Peeler
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 24, 2004No. SC 16571PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PALMER, J.
A jury found the defendant, Adrian Peeler, guilty of conspiracy to commit murder in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-54a1 and 53a-48.2 The trial court rendered judgment in accordance with the jury verdict,3 and the defendant appealed,4 claiming that the trial court improperly had: (1) rejected his claim that the state, during jury selection, exercised a peremptory challenge in a racially discriminatory manner; (2) per*615mitted the state to introduce certain hearsay statements under the coconspirator exception to the hearsay rule; and (3) permitted the state to introduce…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Wainwright v. GreenfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- State v. FauciSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. RizzoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- State v. CamachoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.