Legal Opinion

Sims v. Dame

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1888No. 13,025PublishedCited by 20 opinions

From the Clinton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.

The original complaint in this case consisted of two paragraphs. While the first paragraph contained some phraseology peculiar to the action of replevin, it, in legal effect, only inferentially charged the conversion by the defendants, Milton L. Sims and Alfred Maudlin, of two hundred bushels of wheat belonging to the plaintiff, Jacob Dame, of the alleged value of two hundred dollars.

The second charged the defendants with having wrongfully and forcibly taken possession of fifty acres of growing *128wheat belonging to the plaintiff, and with having converted the wheat to their own use. .

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lowry v. DuttonIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. PeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Widup v. GibsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Harris v. OsenbackIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Peters v. BantaIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Colchen v. NindeIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Bedford Belt Railway Co. v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Lange v. DammierIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Hellings v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API