Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Peck
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Clay Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Zollars, C. J. —
Appellee’s complaint is in two paragraphs. In the first he asks a judgment for the value of cattle that were killed, and in the second a judgment for the amount of damage to other cattle that were injured by a train of appellant’s cars. The cattle entered upon the track and were killed *69at a point where the company had neglected to build and maintain a fence.
Under the two assignments of error, that the court below erred in overruling its motion in arrest of judgment, and that neither paragraph of the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, appellant,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Yost v. ConroyIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Fankboner v. FankbonerIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
- Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. MilliganIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Smith v. FreemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Iles v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Branch v. FaustIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Charlie Stuart Oldsmobile, Inc. v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- City of Lafayette v. NagleIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Hellings v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Ashton v. ShepherdIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.