Harris v. Osenback
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Hamilton Court of Common Pleas.
1Per curiam
Suit upon a note. Judgment for plaintiff, by default, for 148 dollars, 25 cents.
The errors assigned are, that the judgment is for 21 dollars, 78 cents too much; and that the complaint does not appear to have been subscribed by either the plaintiff or his attorney, as required by the statute. 2 R. S. p. 43.
The plaintiff offers, in this Court, to remit the excess for which judgment was taken. The failure to subscribe the complaint is such a merely formal or clerical error as the plaintiff should have been permitted to amend, when pointed out in the Court below, and will be considered as amended…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Sims v. DameIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Lowry v. DuttonIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. PeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Plew v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Canadian Bank of Commerce v. LealeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.