Legal Opinion

Harris v. Osenback

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1859PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from the Hamilton Court of Common Pleas.

1Per curiam

Suit upon a note. Judgment for plaintiff, by default, for 148 dollars, 25 cents.

The errors assigned are, that the judgment is for 21 dollars, 78 cents too much; and that the complaint does not appear to have been subscribed by either the plaintiff or his attorney, as required by the statute. 2 R. S. p. 43.

The plaintiff offers, in this Court, to remit the excess for which judgment was taken. The failure to subscribe the complaint is such a merely formal or clerical error as the plaintiff should have been permitted to amend, when pointed out in the Court below, and will be considered as amended…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sims v. DameIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Lowry v. DuttonIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. PeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Plew v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Canadian Bank of Commerce v. LealeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API