Legal Opinion
Goldfisher v. Connecticut Siting Council
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 2, 2006No. AC 26303PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the trial court correctly dismissed the administrative appeal by the plaintiff, Daniel M. Goldfisher, from the decision by the Connecticut siting council (siting council) on the basis that the plaintiff was not *195aggrieved.1 We affirm the judgment dismissing the plaintiffs administrative appeal.
The record discloses the following pertinent facts and procedural background. The plaintiff is the owner of real property at 13 West Cove Road in East Haddam. On or about April 21, 2003, the defendant Message Center Management, Inc.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nader v. AltermattSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Eder Bros. v. Wine Merchants of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Bongiorno Supermarket, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Levine v. Police CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mayer v. Historic Dist. Comm'n of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Brouillard v. Connecticut Siting CouncilConnecticut Superior Court · 2010
- Jefferson Solar, LLC v. FuelCell Energy, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2022
- State Marshal Assn. of Connecticut, Inc. v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
- Town of Wallingford v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.