Legal Opinion
Rudack v. Valentine
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 10, 1937PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosenman, J.
Petitioner seeks a peremptory order of mandamus requiring the defendants to issue to him a license to operate a taxicab within the city of New York, application for which was made by him on April 22, 1937. The refusal to grant the license is based upon chapter 27-a of the Code of Ordinances of such city, which became effective on March 9, 1937.
The Greater New York Charter (§ 51) provides in part as follows: “ Subject to the Constitution and laws of the State, the board of aldermen shall have power to provide for the licensing and otherwise regulating the business of dirt carts, public…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Packard v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Waldorf-Astoria Hotel Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Birmingham Interurban Taxicab Service Corp. v. McLendonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Yellow Taxicab Co. v. GaynorNew York Supreme Court · 1913
- State v. LefebvreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Levine v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Martin v. State Liquor AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- Kelleher v. MinshullWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Patterson v. CareyNew York Supreme Court · 1975
- United States v. Yellow Cab Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1946
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.