Legal Opinion

United States v. Yellow Cab Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided November 15, 1946No. Civ. A. 46C1339PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LA BUY, District Judge.

This is an action by the government under Section 4 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 4, seeking relief against an alleged conspiracy and combination to restrain and to monopolize trade in violation of sections 1 and 2 of that Act. Defendants have filed motions to dismiss the complaint under Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

The action is brought against six corporations and one individual. Checker Cab Manufacturing Corporation manufactures motor vehicles…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Stafford v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Jerry E. Feldman, President, and Checker Taxi Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  3. Eastman v. Yellow Cab Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API