Legal Opinion
Howell Industries, Inc. v. Sharon Steel Corp.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided December 31, 1981No. Civ. A. 75-70319PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON ROBINSON-PATMAN CLAIMS
PATRICIA J. BOYLE, District Judge.
Before the Court are two motions by Defendant seeking summary judgment with respect to some of Plaintiff’s antitrust allegations under the Robinson-Patman amendments to the Clayton Act (“Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 13. Defendant contends here that the allegations of Count VII of the Complaint, found in Plaintiff’s “Amendments to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint” filed in 1976, do not raise actionable antitrust claims under subsections 2(a), 2(c), 2(d), 2(e), and…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- J. Truett Payne Co. v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Corn Products Refining Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Federal Trade Commission v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Black Gold, Ltd., a Colorado Corporation, and Cross v. Rockwool Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- NL Industries, Inc. v. Gulf & Western Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1986