Legal Opinion

State v. Hebert

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided October 9, 1987No. A-1743PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SINGLETON, Judge.

In this case we are asked to consider the validity of 5 Alaska Administrative Code (AAC) 27.987, a fish and game regulation governing commercial herring fishing in Norton Sound. On February 6, 1986, Fish and Wildlife Protection officers charged Jay Hebert with violating 5 AAC 27.987. 1

Hebert was charged because he fished as an entry-permit holder in an exclusive use area, Norton Sound, after having already fished in nonexclusive-use areas, Bristol Bay and Security Cove, during the 1985 fishing season. On May 5, 1986, Hebert moved to dismiss the charge on the ground…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State v. EricksonAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. Aleut CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Meier v. State, Board of FisheriesAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. KENAI PEN. FISHERMAN'S CO-OP. ASS'N v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tongass Sport Fishing Ass'n v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. Kenaitze Indian TribeAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. HebertAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Stepovak-Shumagin Set Net Ass'n v. State, Board of FisheriesAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Ogle v. Salamatof Native Ass'n, Inc.District Court, D. Alaska · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API