Legal Opinion

United States v. Hernandez-Vasquez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 22, 2008No. 06-50198PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING AND AMENDED OPINION

ORDER

The opinion filed on October 31, 2007 and published at slip opinion 14310-14325, 506 F.3d 811 (9th Cir.2007) is AMENDED as follows:

Replace the third full paragraph on page 819 with the following:

Accordingly, we hold that a Sell order must provide at least some limitations on the medications that may be administered and the maximum dosages and duration of treatment. At a minimum, to pass muster under Sell, the district court’s order must identify: (1) the specific medication or range of medications that the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Washington v. HarperSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Riggins v. NevadaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Sell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. United States v. Herbert G. Evans, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. United States v. GrapeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. Ruiz-GaxiolaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. LoughnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. Simon DillonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API