United States v. Crawford
United States Court of Military Appeals
1DissentLatimer, Judge
I dissent.
I cannot join with my brothers for the reason that their rationalization is predicated on the conclusion that instructions on the maximum sentence are governed by the same rules which control the president’s charge on findings. Such doctrine is false and overlooks entirely the basic difference in the rights and privileges of an accused after conviction and the functional change of court-martial members from jurors to judges. On findings, it is the duty of the members of the court to determine facts, but thereafter, during sentence proceedings, they act as the military counterpart of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. RinehartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
- United States v. SimpsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
- United States v. CuenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
- United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
- United States v. HollisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.