Legal Opinion

Arthur v. Ticor Title Ins. Co. of Florida

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 18, 2009No. 08-1727PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge KING and Senior Judge HAMILTON joined.

OPINION

WILKINSON, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs are homeowners in Maryland who purchased title insurance from Ticor Title Insurance Company of Florida when they refinanced their mortgages. They allege that Ticor charged them rates that were higher than the applicable rates Ti-cor had on file with the Maryland Insurance Commissioner. And plaintiffs claim that Ticor, by splitting these excessive charges with its local agents, violated Section 8 of the Real Estate Settlement…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lloyd v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Nedzad Krzalic and Danijela Krzalic v. Republic Title Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  3. Benson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. Zappone v. Liberty Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  5. Tyna L. Boulware, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Crossland Mortgage Corporation, United States of America, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Mims v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  2. Tracey v. First American Title Ins.District Court, D. Maryland · 2013
  3. Galiano v. Fidelity National Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  4. Hancock v. Chicago Title InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2009
  5. Slapikas v. First American Title InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API