Legal Opinion

Galiano v. Fidelity National Title Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 3, 2012No. Docket No. 10-4941-cvPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHIN, Circuit Judge:

In this putative class action, plaintiffs-appellants allege that defendants-appellees — title insurance companies — sold title insurance at improperly inflated rates as a result of illegal kickbacks in violation of the anti-kickback provision of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (“RES-PA”). See RESPA § 8(a), 12 U.S.C. § 2607(a) (“§ 8(a)”). The district court (Platt, J.) dismissed the action. Plaintiffs appeal. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

1. Facts

The following facts are drawn from plaintiffs’ first amended consolidated class…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  3. Cohen v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  4. Freeman v. Quicken Loans, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Nedzad Krzalic and Danijela Krzalic v. Republic Title Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Everlast World's Boxing Headquarters Corp. v. Ringside, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  2. Donoghue v. Bulldog Investors General PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  3. Trachtenberg v. Department of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  4. Matana v. MerkinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  5. Denise Edwards v. the First American CorpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API