Legal Opinion
Tyna L. Boulware, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Crossland Mortgage Corporation, United States of America, Amicus Curiae
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided May 22, 2002No. 01-2318PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Chief Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILLIAMS and Judge TRAXLER joined.
OPINION
WILKINSON, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff Tyna Boulware claims that § 8(b) of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (“RE SPA”) is a broad price control statute prohibiting any overcharge for real estate settlement services. Boul-ware seeks to certify a class to challenge Crossland Mortgage Corporation’s alleged overcharge for credit reports. The district court found that Boulware did not allege any split or kickback of the overcharge from Crossland to a third party. It…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Patricia J. Mayes v. Stanley Rapoport Judith Rapoport David Key, D/B/A Key Coffee Roasters, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Cohen v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- McKell v. Washington Mutual, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Nedzad Krzalic and Danijela Krzalic v. Republic Title Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Alston v. Countrywide Financial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Patrick Baehr v. Creig Northrop Team, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.