Legal Opinion

North Carolina Agricultural Credit Corp. v. Boushall

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 20, 1927PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.

Under what circumstances may an officer of a corporation recover compensation for services in the absence of an express contract ?

In Caho v. R. R., 147 N. C., p. 20, Connor, J., said: “In the absence of an express promise, made prior to the performance of the service, an officer of a corporation cannot maintain an action for compensation that he cannot sue upon a quantum meruit.” “An officer has no right to compensation for services except by express agreement preceding the services rendered.” “An agreement by the board of directors to pay an officer or director for past services, where there…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fountain v. County of PittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. Caho v. Norfolk & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. Borden v. City of GoldsboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. Chiles v. United States Furniture Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fulton v. TalbertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. S & W Realty & Bonded Commercial Agency, Inc. v. Duckworth & Shelton, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Smith v. Stanfield Hosiery Mill, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. State v. . IsaacSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. State v. IsaacSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API