Borden v. City of Goldsboro
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Civil action, beard at January, Term, 1917, of "Wayne, before Cox, J., upon exceptions to report of referee. To tbe rulings of tbe Court botb parties excepted and appealed from tbe judgment rendered.
1Opinion of the Court
PLAINTIFF'S APPEAL.
Beown, J.
Tbe plaintiff was appointed sinking fund commissioner by tbe board of aldermen, and served for nearly sixteen years. No definite salary was fixed until 3 August, 1914, wben tbe board fixed bis salary at $100 per annum for tbe period for which be bad been commissioner, and in same resolution undertook to charge plaintiff with $2,885.05, being the difference between tbe interest received by plaintiff and that which defendant charges be should be chargeable with.
Tbe plaintiff excepts because the referee and court refused to fix bis compensation as upon a quantum…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Barnhill v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Caho v. Norfolk & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Chiles v. United States Furniture Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Sams v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- State v. . WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Reed v. . Madison CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Grimes v. . HolmesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.