Legal Opinion
Gilbert Yniques Angel Diaz Carl S. Ramos John Balderama Tony L. Hernandez v. Victor G. Cabral Mario G. Obledo
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 16, 1993No. 91-15865PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POOLE, Circuit Judge:
The district court dismissed plaintiff Gilbert Yniques’ lawsuit after defendant Victor Cabral removed the case from state court and Yniques joined Cabral’s law partner as a defendant, and subsequently declined to reconsider its order. Yniques argues that 28 U.S.C. § 1447(e) requires a district court to remand a complaint to state court where the plaintiff has joined a non-diverse defendant to the action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We reverse and remand with instructions to remand the case to state court.
I
On October 19, 1989, Gilbert Yniques filed…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Alphonso Thompson v. The Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles, a Public CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Charles E. McDowell Jr. v. Arthur Calderon, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Casas Office MacHines, Inc. v. Mita Copystar America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Cobb v. Delta Exports, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Palestini v. General Dynamics Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2000
- Brian S. Faile v. The Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.