Palestini v. General Dynamics Corp.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND
RHOADES, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Plaintiffs have filed a motion to remand this matter to state court. They argue that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction because the first amended complaint adds new Defendants that defeat complete diversity. Defendants have filed motions to dismiss and to strike. Because the motion to remand pertains to the Court’s jurisdiction, the Court addresses that motion first. The Court grants Plaintiffs’ motion to remand and denies Defendants’ motions as moot.
II. Background
On July 14, 1999, Plaintiffs filed a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Donald Newcombe v. Adolf Coors Company Foote, Cone and Belding and Time, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Austin v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- IBC Aviation Services, Inc. v. Compañia Mexicana De AviacionDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2000
- McGrath v. Home Depot USA, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2014
- Bonner v. Fuji Photo FilmDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2006
- Adam Vargas v. Northrop Grumman Corporation; Patrick Moisan; Herschel Hill; and Does 1 to 100, inclusiveDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2026
- Ashley Claar v. Centaur Holdings United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2023
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.