Legal Opinion
White v. Day
Ho-Chunk Nation Trial Court
Decided December 9, 2008No. CV 07-54PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER (Remanding)
TODD R. MATHA, Chief Judge.
INTRODUCTION
On August 4, 2008, the Ho-Chunk Nation Supreme Court (hereinafter Supreme Court) reversed and remanded a decision that this Court rendered in an administrative review action. The Supreme Court instructed the Court to conduct further proceedings, which the Court deemed inappropriate since it does not exercise the role of fact-finder in such matters. The following discussion covers the relevant le*257gal issues necessary to appropriately render a decision on remand.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The Supreme Court remanded the instant case for proceedings…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ho-Chunk Nation v. Ho-Chunk Nation Grievance Review BoardHo-Chunk Nation Trial Court · 2010
- Radtke v. ZunkerHo-Chunk Nation Supreme Court · 2014