Legal Opinion

Radtke v. Zunker

Ho-Chunk Nation Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 2014No. SU 14-02Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER (Denying Appeal)

2Per curiam

On February 14, 2014, the appellant, appearing pro se, filed a timely appeal of a final Trial Court judgment issued on December 16, 2013. HCN KApp. P. 7(b)(1), 11(a), available at http://www.ho-chunknation.com/?PageId=123. “Any party to a civil action ... who is dissatisfied with [a] judgment ... may appeal to the Supreme Court.” HCN Const,, art. VII, § 14, available at http://www.ho-ehunknation.com/?PageId=294. Presumptively, “this Court is required to accept appeals which state an appealable issue.” Deena M. Basina v. William P. Smith, SU 00-08 (HCN S.Ct., July 13,…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. White v. DayHo-Chunk Nation Trial Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API