Legal Opinion
Ho-Chunk Nation v. Ho-Chunk Nation Grievance Review Board
Ho-Chunk Nation Trial Court
Decided November 2, 2010No. Nos. CV 10-07, CV 10-12, CV 10-28, CV 10-33, CV 10-76, CV 10-81, CV 10-87Published
1Opinion of the Court
*289ORDER
(Granting Motion)
TODD R. MATHA, Chief Judge, and AMANDA L. ROCKMAN, Associate Judge.
INTRODUCTION
The Court must determine whether the administrative agency remains an indispensable party upon appeal of the agency decision. The Court had adopted a uniform practice of requiring participation of the agency pursuant to applicable procedural rule. The Court further recognized constitutional reasons for agency inclusion, but these concerns have dissipated over time. After careful and exhaustive consideration, the Court decides to permit agency intervention upon appeal, but shall no longer…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Alden v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.