Legal Opinion

Novartis Vaccines & Diagnostics, Inc. v. Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty USA, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 12, 2006No. A107538, A108292PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HAERLE, Acting P. J.—

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant and appellant Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty USA, Inc. (SHAC USA), was formed to support an international campaign to “expose the abusive treatment of animals” by Huntingdon Life Sciences, a biomedical testing laboratory. Respondent Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Inc. (formerly known as Chiron Corporation and referred to herein as Chiron), uses Huntingdon Life Sciences in testing some of its products. After numerous Chiron employees were targeted for “home visits” by SHAC USA—terrifying incidents in which persons broke employees’…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Brandenburg v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Giboney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Cabral v. MartinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Mendoza v. ADP Screening & Selection Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Fremont Reorganizing Corp. v. FaiginCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Gerbosi v. Gaims, Weil, West & Epstein, LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Contreras v. DowlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API