Legal Opinion

Statewide Grievance Committee v. Clarke

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 28, 1998No. AC 17394PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The defendant, Ernesto Clarke, who was admitted as an attorney to the practice of law in Connecticut and the District of Columbia, was ordered disbarred on November 7, 1996, by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Thereafter, the plaintiff, the statewide grievance committee, applied to the Superior Court for reciprocal discipline pursuant to Practice Book § 28A, now Practice Book (1998 Rev.) § 2-39. The trial court scheduled a hearing for May 14, 1997, and ordered that the nonresident defendant be given notice of the application and the hearing date. The defendant filed an answer…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. RiosConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  2. Gelormino v. BlausteinConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  3. Gorneault v. GorneaultConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Chase Manhattan Bank v. AECO Elevator Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  2. Honan v. DimyanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  3. Thomsen v. Aqua Massage International, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  4. State v. Sandra O.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  5. Sevastian v. SevastianConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API