Legal Opinion
Kerman v. Swafford
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided March 27, 1984No. 7245PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINZNER, Judge.
Kerman brought suit against Swafford in order to recover possession of and quiet title to a 180-acre ranch. Kerman moved for a default judgment, and one day later Swafford filed an Answer. The Answer partially confessed judgment and raised counterclaims. The court granted judgment by default but denied a motion to strike the counterclaims. Kerman then moved for summary judgment on the counterclaims. The trial court granted summary judgment with respect to the counterclaim that asserted ownership of three portable buildings located on the ranch. The other claims were…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Goodman v. Brock Ex Rel. Estate of BrockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
- Maxey v. QuintanaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- Holland Furnace Co. v. Trumbull Savings & Loan Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1939
- Roberts v. Piper Aircraft Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
- Salitan v. CarrilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
- Grassie v. Roswell Hospital Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
- Spadaro v. University of New Mexico Board of RegentsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. GomezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
- Giant Cab, Inc. v. CT Towing, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.